Eric Clapton Breaks Silence After Management Sued Widow For Selling CD

Eric Clapton Breaks Silence After Management Sued Widow For Selling CD
Raph_PH, CC BY 2.0 , via Wikimedia Commons

A woman in Germany unknowingly listed a pirated version of an Eric Clapton live album for sale on eBay; the asking price: $11. The CD belonged to the woman’s deceased husband. Clapton’s management sued and won a lawsuit against the woman, and the judge in the case ordered her to pay for the legal fees of both parties (around $3,900). The woman claimed she was unaware that her dead husband’s CD was pirated and removed the listing a day after posting it. 

Clapton’s management issued a statement to the guitarist’s fan club attempting to clarify the situation: “Given the widespread and often misleading press reports about a recent bootleg case involving a woman in Germany, the following provides clarification to set the record straight. Germany is one of several countries where sales of unauthorized and usually poor-quality illegal bootleg CDs are rife, which harms both the industry and purchasers of inferior product. Over a period of more than 10 years, the German lawyers appointed by Eric Clapton, and a significant number of other well-known artists and record companies, have successfully pursued thousands of bootleg cases under routine copyright procedures.

“… when the full facts of this particular case came to light and it was clear the individual is not the type of person Eric Clapton, or his record company, wish to target, Eric Clapton decided not to take any further action and does not intend to collect the costs awarded to him by the Court. Also, he hopes the individual will not herself incur any further costs.”

Eric Clapton’s Management Team

“It is not the intention to target individuals selling isolated CDs from their own collection, but rather the active bootleggers manufacturing unauthorized copies for sale. In the case of an individual selling unauthorized items from a personal collection, if following receipt of a ‘cease and desist’ letter the offending items are withdrawn, any costs would be minimal, or might be waived.

The statement continued: “This case could have been disposed of quickly at minimal cost, but unfortunately in response to the German lawyers’ first standard letter, the individual’s reply included the line (translation): ‘feel free to file a lawsuit if you insist on the demands’. This triggered the next step in the standard legal procedures.”

“If the individual had complied with the initial letter the costs would have been minimal. Had she explained at the outset the full facts in a simple phone call or letter to the lawyers, any claim might, have been waived, and costs avoided. However, the individual appointed a lawyer who appealed the injunction decision. The Judge encouraged the individual to withdraw the appeal to save costs, but she proceeded. The appeal failed and she was ordered to pay the costs of the Court and all of the parties.

“However, when the full facts of this particular case came to light and it was clear the individual is not the type of person Eric Clapton, or his record company, wish to target, Eric Clapton decided not to take any further action and does not intend to collect the costs awarded to him by the Court. Also, he hopes the individual will not herself incur any further costs.”

If the woman tries to sell the CD again, she could face a fine of $282,000 or six months in prison.

B.J. LISKO
Follow B.J.

IN CASE YOU MISSED IT


AROUND THE WEB